<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: TWiki Version 4.0 ist erschienen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/</link>
	<description>...manchmal viel gelaber.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:00:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: christian</title>
		<link>http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/comment-page-1/#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Mar 2006 16:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/#comment-456</guid>
		<description>hey,
bin hei&#223; auf &#252;bersetzen,
wie gehts dem volxbibel-wiki? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey,<br />
bin hei&#223; auf &#252;bersetzen,<br />
wie gehts dem volxbibel-wiki? :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: mzeecedric</title>
		<link>http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/comment-page-1/#comment-455</link>
		<dc:creator>mzeecedric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/#comment-455</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know Rallypoint yet, thanks for the hint! I&#039;ve briefly tested it today. It seems to be a quite &quot;light&quot; thing as far as I could see. I think jotspot is much more powerfull and has many prepared apps. TWiki is a mighty and complex tool we run on our companys intranet. But WYSIWYG Editing isn&#039;t that good yet. Since it&#039;s opensource it depends a on volunteers developing it. A bunch of paid programmers could probably implement the WYSIWYG Editor in no time. Well documentation is still quite poor. Could you find any pricing?
Btw. how can I simply link to an other page in Ralleypoint? Do I have to enter the full url? No WikiWords or something there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know Rallypoint yet, thanks for the hint! I&#8217;ve briefly tested it today. It seems to be a quite &#8220;light&#8221; thing as far as I could see. I think jotspot is much more powerfull and has many prepared apps. TWiki is a mighty and complex tool we run on our companys intranet. But WYSIWYG Editing isn&#8217;t that good yet. Since it&#8217;s opensource it depends a on volunteers developing it. A bunch of paid programmers could probably implement the WYSIWYG Editor in no time. Well documentation is still quite poor. Could you find any pricing?<br />
Btw. how can I simply link to an other page in Ralleypoint? Do I have to enter the full url? No WikiWords or something there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: HASH</title>
		<link>http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/comment-page-1/#comment-454</link>
		<dc:creator>HASH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://m.zung.us/2006/02/03/twiki-version-40-ist-erschienen/#comment-454</guid>
		<description>Good find.  I&#039;ve been testing out Jotspot and Rallypoint lately.  Personally, I like what Rallypoint is doing better than Jotspot.  Twiki looks like it has a little bit different use, more like swiki, and more useful than just a document collaboration app like Rallypoint.  I&#039;ll have to dig into it some more, but it looks good so far!

HASH</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find.  I&#8217;ve been testing out Jotspot and Rallypoint lately.  Personally, I like what Rallypoint is doing better than Jotspot.  Twiki looks like it has a little bit different use, more like swiki, and more useful than just a document collaboration app like Rallypoint.  I&#8217;ll have to dig into it some more, but it looks good so far!</p>
<p>HASH</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

